Understanding the U.S. Governments FAR and DFARS

/in , /by

At the heart of federal contracting is two critical sets of regulations: FAR (the Federal Acquisition Regulation) and DFARS (the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement). They play an essential role in the procurement process, and set the rules and guidelines that contractors must follow when doing business with the U.S. government.

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is the rulebook for federal procurement. It is a comprehensive set of regulations that govern the acquisition process by which the federal government purchases goods and services from contractors. FAR applies uniformly across all federal agencies, providing a standardized framework to ensure consistency in procurement practices. This regulation covers every aspect of the acquisition process, from how contracts are formed and managed to the ethical considerations that contractors must adhere to, making it a cornerstone of federal contracting. The flexibility within FAR allows contracting officers to adapt to specific needs, which is crucial given the diverse range of goods and services that the government procures.

On the other hand, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) serves as an extension of FAR, specifically tailored to meet the needs of the Department of Defense (DoD). While FAR provides the overarching guidelines for federal procurement, DFARS introduces additional rules and requirements that address the unique challenges and concerns of defense-related contracts. These regulations are vital for ensuring that defense procurement aligns with national security considerations, defense logistics, and technology acquisition. One of the most critical aspects of DFARS is its stringent focus on cybersecurity, particularly the safeguarding of sensitive defense information—a concern that is increasingly paramount in today’s digital age.

While FAR and DFARS are closely related, they serve distinct purposes and are applied differently within the federal contracting landscape. The primary difference lies in their scope of application. FAR is designed to apply broadly across all federal agencies, providing a uniform set of rules for procurement activities, regardless of the agency involved. DFARS, however, is specifically focused on the Department of Defense and its associated agencies, supplementing FAR with additional regulations that are necessary for defense-related contracts. This makes DFARS more specialized, with a particular emphasis on issues such as cybersecurity and national security that are not as pronounced in FAR.

The focus of the FAR and DFARS also differs significantly. FAR provides a broad framework that is meant to cover a wide range of procurement activities, ensuring a consistent approach to contracting across the federal government. This includes everything from contract administration and contractor qualifications to ethical considerations and dispute resolution. DFARS, in contrast, is much more focused on the specific needs of the DoD. It addresses areas like defense logistics and the protection of sensitive information, which are critical for defense contracts but may not be as relevant in other areas of federal procurement.

Another important distinction between FAR and DFARS is in their regulatory authority. FAR is governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, which includes representatives from various federal agencies such as the Department of Defense, the General Services Administration (GSA), and NASA. DFARS, on the other hand, is managed by the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (DARC), which ensures that the regulations align with the specific needs and priorities of the DoD.

The complexity of compliance also varies between FAR and DFARS. While FAR is comprehensive, its general nature means it is designed to be applicable across a wide range of federal contracts. DFARS, due to its focus on defense, often contains more stringent and detailed requirements, particularly in areas like cybersecurity.

Lastly, the frequency and nature of updates to FAR and DFARS illustrate another key difference. FAR is regularly updated to reflect changes in law, policy, and best practices across the federal government, maintaining consistency across agencies. DFARS, however, is updated more frequently and often in response to emerging threats, technological advancements, or changes in national security priorities. This makes DFARS a dynamic set of regulations that require contractors to stay vigilant and informed about the latest requirements.

In practice, FAR and DFARS work together to create a comprehensive regulatory framework for federal contracting. FAR provides the foundational rules that apply across all federal procurement activities, while DFARS builds on these rules by adding additional layers of regulation that are specific to defense contracts. For example, while FAR might set the basic rules for how a contract is awarded, DFARS could impose additional cybersecurity requirements for contractors handling sensitive defense information, ensuring that these contracts meet the high standards required for national security.

Compliance with FAR and DFARS is not just a legal obligation for federal contractors—it is a strategic necessity. Understanding these regulations enables businesses to navigate the complex landscape of federal procurement, compete effectively for contracts, and build trust with government agencies. Non-compliance, on the other hand, can result in severe penalties, including fines, contract termination, or even being barred from future contracts.

By staying informed about these regulations and ensuring compliance, businesses can position themselves for success in the highly competitive world of government contracting. Whether you’re working with a federal agency or directly with the Department of Defense, a solid grasp of FAR and DFARS will help you navigate the regulatory landscape and secure lucrative contracts in the federal marketplace.

You can find the U.S. Governments FAR and DFARS at Acquisition.gov and the links below:

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far
https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars

Cited Sources:

“FAR vs DFARS: What Is the Difference and How to Prepare.” Deltek.com, 2024, www.deltek.com/en/government-contracting/guide/federal-acquisition-regulation/vs-dfars. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

USFCR. “Understanding the FAR and DFARS: Your Key to Federal Contracting.” Usfcr.com, 2020, blogs.usfcr.com/understanding-the-far-and-dfars. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

“FAR and DFARS Regulations, Explained: How Automation Aids Compliance.” Appian.com, 2023, appian.com/blog/acp/public-sector/far-dfars-regulations-explained. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

At the heart of federal contracting is two critical sets of regulations: FAR (the Federal Acquisition Regulation) and DFARS (the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement). They play an essential role in the procurement process, and set the rules and guidelines that contractors must follow when doing business with the U.S. government.

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is the rulebook for federal procurement. It is a comprehensive set of regulations that govern the acquisition process by which the federal government purchases goods and services from contractors. FAR applies uniformly across all federal agencies, providing a standardized framework to ensure consistency in procurement practices. This regulation covers every aspect of the acquisition process, from how contracts are formed and managed to the ethical considerations that contractors must adhere to, making it a cornerstone of federal contracting. The flexibility within FAR allows contracting officers to adapt to specific needs, which is crucial given the diverse range of goods and services that the government procures.

On the other hand, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) serves as an extension of FAR, specifically tailored to meet the needs of the Department of Defense (DoD). While FAR provides the overarching guidelines for federal procurement, DFARS introduces additional rules and requirements that address the unique challenges and concerns of defense-related contracts. These regulations are vital for ensuring that defense procurement aligns with national security considerations, defense logistics, and technology acquisition. One of the most critical aspects of DFARS is its stringent focus on cybersecurity, particularly the safeguarding of sensitive defense information—a concern that is increasingly paramount in today’s digital age.

While FAR and DFARS are closely related, they serve distinct purposes and are applied differently within the federal contracting landscape. The primary difference lies in their scope of application. FAR is designed to apply broadly across all federal agencies, providing a uniform set of rules for procurement activities, regardless of the agency involved. DFARS, however, is specifically focused on the Department of Defense and its associated agencies, supplementing FAR with additional regulations that are necessary for defense-related contracts. This makes DFARS more specialized, with a particular emphasis on issues such as cybersecurity and national security that are not as pronounced in FAR.

The focus of the FAR and DFARS also differs significantly. FAR provides a broad framework that is meant to cover a wide range of procurement activities, ensuring a consistent approach to contracting across the federal government. This includes everything from contract administration and contractor qualifications to ethical considerations and dispute resolution. DFARS, in contrast, is much more focused on the specific needs of the DoD. It addresses areas like defense logistics and the protection of sensitive information, which are critical for defense contracts but may not be as relevant in other areas of federal procurement.

Another important distinction between FAR and DFARS is in their regulatory authority. FAR is governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, which includes representatives from various federal agencies such as the Department of Defense, the General Services Administration (GSA), and NASA. DFARS, on the other hand, is managed by the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (DARC), which ensures that the regulations align with the specific needs and priorities of the DoD.

The complexity of compliance also varies between FAR and DFARS. While FAR is comprehensive, its general nature means it is designed to be applicable across a wide range of federal contracts. DFARS, due to its focus on defense, often contains more stringent and detailed requirements, particularly in areas like cybersecurity.

Lastly, the frequency and nature of updates to FAR and DFARS illustrate another key difference. FAR is regularly updated to reflect changes in law, policy, and best practices across the federal government, maintaining consistency across agencies. DFARS, however, is updated more frequently and often in response to emerging threats, technological advancements, or changes in national security priorities. This makes DFARS a dynamic set of regulations that require contractors to stay vigilant and informed about the latest requirements.

In practice, FAR and DFARS work together to create a comprehensive regulatory framework for federal contracting. FAR provides the foundational rules that apply across all federal procurement activities, while DFARS builds on these rules by adding additional layers of regulation that are specific to defense contracts. For example, while FAR might set the basic rules for how a contract is awarded, DFARS could impose additional cybersecurity requirements for contractors handling sensitive defense information, ensuring that these contracts meet the high standards required for national security.

Compliance with FAR and DFARS is not just a legal obligation for federal contractors—it is a strategic necessity. Understanding these regulations enables businesses to navigate the complex landscape of federal procurement, compete effectively for contracts, and build trust with government agencies. Non-compliance, on the other hand, can result in severe penalties, including fines, contract termination, or even being barred from future contracts.

By staying informed about these regulations and ensuring compliance, businesses can position themselves for success in the highly competitive world of government contracting. Whether you’re working with a federal agency or directly with the Department of Defense, a solid grasp of FAR and DFARS will help you navigate the regulatory landscape and secure lucrative contracts in the federal marketplace.

You can find the U.S. Governments FAR and DFARS at Acquisition.gov and the links below:

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far
https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars

Cited Sources:

“FAR vs DFARS: What Is the Difference and How to Prepare.” Deltek.com, 2024, www.deltek.com/en/government-contracting/guide/federal-acquisition-regulation/vs-dfars. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

USFCR. “Understanding the FAR and DFARS: Your Key to Federal Contracting.” Usfcr.com, 2020, blogs.usfcr.com/understanding-the-far-and-dfars. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

“FAR and DFARS Regulations, Explained: How Automation Aids Compliance.” Appian.com, 2023, appian.com/blog/acp/public-sector/far-dfars-regulations-explained. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

Exploring How Government Contracts Get Evaluated

/in , /by

The proposal evaluation process for government contracts is a critical step that determines which contractors will win lucrative contracts. Therefore, understanding how government agencies evaluate proposals can help prepare your organization in this highly competitive field.

     The evaluation process for government contracts typically follows a structured and transparent procedure to ensure fairness and compliance with regulations. While the specifics can vary between agencies, the general steps usually include the release of a Request for Information (RFI), also known as a Sources Sought. An RFI is an agency’s first step in gathering information on whether contractors can satisfy their requirements. Through an RFI, government agencies determine if their contract can be released under a socio-economic set-aside, which helps them meet inclusion quotas by reserving a certain dollar amount for specific socio-economic groups. Following the RFI, an agency will release a Request for Proposal (RFP) also known as a Solicitation, outlining the requirements, evaluation criteria, and submission deadlines. Contractors then submit their proposals by the specified deadline, ensuring they address all the requirements stated in the RFP. Proposals undergo an initial screening to ensure they meet basic requirements, such as timely submission and completeness.

     A panel of subject matter experts will review the technical aspects of the proposals to assess their feasibility and the contractor’s capability to meet the project requirements. The cost proposals are evaluated to ensure they are reasonable, realistic, and within the agency’s budget. The contractor’s past performance on similar projects is reviewed to gauge their reliability and quality of work. The agency determines which proposal offers the best value, considering both technical and cost factors, before awarding the contract to the contractor whose proposal is deemed to offer the best value to the government.

     Government agencies typically use a set of common criteria to evaluate proposals. Understanding these criteria can help you word your proposals to meet the government’s expectations. Some of the most common criteria include the technical approach, management plan, past performance, personnel qualifications, cost, and compliance. The technical approach evaluates how well the proposal demonstrates an understanding of the project requirements and the proposed methods to achieve them. The management plan assesses the contractor’s plan for managing the project, including timelines, resources, and risk management strategies. Past performance reviews the contractor’s history of successfully completing similar projects, including references and performance reviews. Personnel qualifications examine the qualifications and experience of the team members who will work on the project. Cost evaluates the proposed budget and its alignment with the project scope and the government’s financial constraints.

     Government agencies use various scoring methods to evaluate proposals, ensuring a fair and objective assessment. The most common methods include numerical scoring, adjectival rating, and weighted scoring. Numerical scoring assigns numerical values to different evaluation criteria, with higher scores indicating better performance. Adjectival rating uses qualitative descriptors such as Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, and Unsatisfactory to rate each criterion. Weighted scoring assigns different weights to each criterion based on their importance and calculates a weighted score for each proposal.

     Creating a compelling proposal requires careful planning, attention to detail, and a clear understanding of the government’s needs. Thoroughly reading the RFP is essential to fully understand the requirements and evaluation criteria. Address every point in your proposal to avoid disqualification. Highlight your strengths by emphasizing your unique qualifications, past performance, and technical expertise that make you the best candidate for the contract. Be clear and concise, writing in a well-organized manner that is easy to follow. Provide evidence to support your claims, such as past project successes, references, and detailed resumes of your team members. Offer a realistic and competitive price, demonstrating how you provide the best value without compromising quality. Finally, proofread your proposal to eliminate errors and ensure it meets all formatting and submission requirements.

     Understanding the proposal evaluation process is crucial for success in government contracting. By knowing the common criteria, scoring methods, and best practices for creating compelling proposals, you can increase your chances of winning contracts and building a strong relationship with government agencies. The key is to align your proposal with the government’s needs and clearly demonstrate your ability to fulfill the needs expressed by agencies.

Cited Sources:

“CHAPTER 3: EVALUATION and DECISION PROCESS | Acquisition.GOV.” Acquisition.gov, ACQ.gov, 2024, www.acquisition.gov/afars/chapter-3-evaluation-and-decision-process. Accessed 26 July 2024.

“LinkedIn.” Linkedin.com, 2024, www.linkedin.com/pulse/bid-proposal-process-government-contracts-how-create-winning/. Accessed 26 July 2024.

Understanding the Differences between Prime Contractors and Subcontractors in U.S. Government Contracts

/in , /by

In the world of U.S. government contracting, businesses can participate as either prime contractors or subcontractors. Each role offers unique opportunities and challenges, and understanding the distinctions is crucial for any company looking to enter the federal marketplace.

Prime Contractor: The Lead Player

A prime contractor is the main entity responsible for the execution of a government contract, holding a direct contractual relationship with the government agency. The prime contractor oversees the entire project, ensuring all aspects are completed on time and within budget. This role involves significant responsibilities, including project management, compliance with contract terms and federal regulations, and managing subcontractors. 

Prime contractors bear the bulk of the project’s risk, which includes financial, performance, and compliance risks. They must ensure that all regulations are followed and that the project meets the government’s requirements. This position offers several advantages, such as having substantial control over the project, maintaining direct communication with the government’s representatives, and potentially securing future contract opportunities. However, it also comes with challenges, including high levels of responsibility, complex compliance requirements, and substantial financial risks associated with delays or performance issues.

Subcontractor: The Specialist Support

A subcontractor is selected by the prime contractor to perform specific tasks or provide specialized services that are part of the larger contract. Subcontractors focus on their areas of expertise, executing particular aspects of the project as defined by their agreement with the prime contractor. They are required to comply with the terms set by the prime contractor, which may include adhering to relevant federal regulations and providing necessary documentation and progress reports.

Subcontracting allows organizations to concentrate on their specialization without the burden of managing the entire project. Subcontractors typically face less financial and operational risk compared to prime contractors, making this an attractive option for many businesses. Additionally, subcontracting can be a valuable stepping stone for gaining experience and building relationships in the government contracting space. However, subcontractors have limited control over the overall project and are dependent on the prime contractor’s decisions and performance, which can affect their success and payment.

Strategic Considerations

Deciding whether to pursue a role as a prime contractor or subcontractor depends on several factors, including your company’s size, resources, experience, and long-term goals. For small businesses, subcontracting can provide a way to gain experience and develop past performance without bearing the full responsibility of a prime contractor. Small businesses can also leverage set-aside programs, such as the 8(a) Business Development Program or HUBZone, to compete for prime contracts with reduced competition.

For larger government contracting organizations, becoming a prime contractor can offer greater control and higher revenue potential. Companies with the necessary resources and expertise may find this path more rewarding despite the higher risks. However, even large contractors can benefit from subcontracting on larger projects, allowing them to participate in significant contracts without assuming the full responsibilities and risks of a prime contractor.

Both prime contractors and subcontractors play crucial roles in the federal contracting ecosystem. Each role offers distinct benefits and challenges, and the right choice depends on your business’s capabilities and objectives. By understanding these differences, companies can strategically position themselves for success in the competitive world of U.S. government contracts.

Cited Sources:

“Prime Contractor vs. Subcontractor: What’s the Difference?” Indeed Career Guide, 2024, www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/prime-contractor-vs-subcontractor#:~:text=A%20prime%20contractor%2C%20sometimes%20also,not%20superior%20to%20these%20subcontractors. Accessed 23 June 2024.

“Prime and Subcontracting | U.S. Small Business Administration.” Sba.gov, 2023, www.sba.gov/federal-contracting/contracting-guide/prime-subcontracting. Accessed 23 June 2024.

Cinco, Cielo. “Prime Contractor vs. Subcontractor: Things You Need to Know – ExecutiveBiz.” ExecutiveBiz, 16 Feb. 2022, executivebiz.com/articles/prime-contractor-vs-subcontractor-things-you-need-to-know/. Accessed 23 June 2024.

‌

‌

Understanding The Many Different Types of Governments For Contractors Interested in Working With The Federal Government

/in , /by

As a federal contractor working with the U.S. government, understanding the various types of government contracts is crucial. Different contract types offer unique benefits and considerations, shaping how projects are executed, costs are managed, and risks are allocated.

1. Fixed-Price Government Contracts

Fixed-price contracts establish a set price for goods or services, providing budget certainty for both the government and the contractor. These contracts ensure that the total cost is known upfront and remains fixed unless there are authorized changes. Contractors bear the risk of cost overruns and must manage costs within the fixed price. This setup incentivizes contractors to control costs and deliver efficiently to maximize profit margins.

Fixed-price contracts are commonly used in construction projects, where the scope is well-defined, and in product delivery, such as manufacturing and delivering specific products like military equipment or software systems. They are also suitable for routine services, like janitorial or maintenance work, where the scope and duration are clear.

Types: Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Fixed-Price Incentive (FPI), and Fixed-Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FPEPA).

2. Cost-Reimbursement Government Contracts

Cost-reimbursement contracts reimburse contractors for allowable costs and include an additional profit or fee. These contracts offer flexibility and are suitable for uncertain or complex projects where costs are challenging to estimate upfront. The government shares the risk of cost overruns, which encourages contractors to manage costs effectively.

These contracts are ideal for research and development projects involving innovative technology or scientific research with unpredictable costs. They are also used in exploratory projects, where the scope may evolve based on initial findings, such as environmental impact studies. Additionally, they are appropriate for complex systems integration, where technical requirements may change during the project.

Cost-reimbursement contracts reimburse contractors for allowable costs and include an additional profit or fee. Key aspects include:

Types: Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF), Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee (CPIF), and Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF).

3. Time and Material (T&M) Contracts

Time and Material (T&M) contracts reimburse contractors based on actual labor hours and materials used. This contract type offers flexibility, making it ideal for projects with uncertain scopes or durations. Under T&M contracts, the government assumes the risk of cost overruns, which encourages efficient resource use. However, careful management is required to control costs and handle the administrative burden.

T&M contracts are often used for emergency repairs, where the full extent of damage is unknown until work begins. They are also suitable for consulting services, providing expertise on an as-needed basis for project support or management. IT support services, offering technical support or maintenance for government IT systems, are another common use case.

4. Incentive Contracts

Incentive contracts align contractor interests with government objectives by providing financial incentives for performance. These contracts are performance-based, meaning contractors earn incentives for meeting or exceeding specified performance metrics. Both contractors and the government share risks and rewards, promoting collaboration.

Incentive contracts are effective for cost savings initiatives, where cost efficiency is crucial, and savings can be shared between the contractor and the government. They are also used in quality improvement programs focused on enhancing the quality of products or services, with rewards for meeting high standards. Additionally, they are suitable for projects that prioritize timely delivery, incentivizing early or on-time delivery of critical systems or infrastructure.

Types: Fixed-Price Incentive (FPI), Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee (CPIF), and Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF).

5. Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts

IDIQ contracts allow for indefinite quantities of goods or services over a specified period. They offer flexibility, enabling the government to procure goods or services as needed without repetitive negotiations. Orders are issued as task orders or delivery orders based on specific requirements.

IDIQ contracts are commonly used for supply chain management, providing ongoing supplies such as medical equipment or office supplies over a contract period. They are also used for professional services, offering consulting, training, or IT services where needs may vary over time. Additionally, IDIQ contracts are suitable for construction services, performing construction or renovation work on an as-needed basis for various projects.

Types: IDIQ, Requirements Contract, and Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA).

Understanding these contract types helps contractors navigate the complexities of government contracting, manage risks effectively, and deliver successful outcomes for government projects. Each contract type offers unique advantages and challenges, shaping how projects are executed and how costs and risks are managed.As a minority owned, Hubzone set-aside holder Sabre88 understands the importance of recognizing which contracts are right for us as a team to bid on so that we have the best chance at winning the right bids, and submitting competitive proposals. 

Sources Sought:

“Subpart 1816.3—Cost-Reimbursement Contracts | Acquisition.GOV.” Acquisition.gov, ACQ.gov, 2024, www.acquisition.gov/nfs/subpart-1816.3%E2%80%94cost-reimbursement-contracts. Accessed 29 May 2024.

“Types of Government Contracts.” Government Contracting Academy, 25 June 2021, governmentcontractingacademy.com/types-of-government-contracts/#:~:text=Cost%2Dplus%20fixed%20fee%20contracts%20require%20that%20you,is%20either%20incredibly%20difficult%20or%20relatively%20undefined. Accessed 29 May 2024.

‌“Types of Government Contracts That You Should Know – GovCon Wire.” GovCon Wire, 24 Mar. 2022, www.govconwire.com/articles/types-of-government-contracts-that-you-should-know/#:~:text=Incentive%20contracts%20are%20types%20of%20government%20contracts,encourage%20efficiency%20and%20excellence%20among%20government%20contractors. Accessed 29 May 2024.

‌Mydeen Ferozkhan. “Different Types of Government Contracts | XcelHR.” XcelHR, 16 Aug. 2019, xcelhr.com/resources/best-hr-articles/govt-contract-types#:~:text=Cost%20Reimbursement%20Contract.%20While%20cost%20reimbursement%20contracts,of%20a%20contract%20cannot%20be%20estimated%20accurately. Accessed 29 May 2024.

Photo Credit:

“Free Photo | Side View of Woman Holding Mug and Working on Laptop at the Office.” Freepik, 2020, www.freepik.com/free-photo/side-view-woman-holding-mug-working-laptop-office_7768800.htm. Accessed 29 May 2024.

‌

Exploring the U.S. Government Contract Opportunities: Federal, State, and Local Contracts

/in , /by

Government contracts are a valuable avenue for businesses seeking growth and impact. Navigating the world of government contracts involves understanding the nuances between federal, state, and local opportunities. Between the three, each procurement channel offers both unique advantages and challenges for government contractors.

Federal contracts are governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), there are hundreds of opportunities that are released on national procurement sites on a daily basis. Federal contracts are typically larger in scope and complexity, and therefore attract intense competition from major corporations and small businesses alike. However, they offer diverse sectors such as defense, healthcare, and technology, with higher budgets and potential for global impact. Federal contracts can be found on SAM.gov, as well as Government Agencies specific procurement sites, they are oftentimes the most easy to find as they come out most frequently in comparison to the other two procurement channels.

In contrast, state contracts focus on regional growth and development. State contracts are governed by state-specific procurement laws, these contracts involve smaller, localized projects that address state-specific needs. While competition is generally less intense, the scope may be limited, and funding budgets tend to be lower compared to federal projects. Strategic approaches for state contracts include tailoring offerings to meet local needs, leveraging local networks for recommendations, and using smaller contracts as stepping stones for growth. State contracts can be discovered on state procurement sites such as NJStart, hosted by the New Jersey state government or the New York State’s Office of General Services.

Local contracts emphasize community impact and relationship building. These projects directly benefit the immediate community, ranging from infrastructure to public services. While processes are often simpler and more accessible to smaller businesses, they are limited to local projects and may have smaller budgets. Small businesses can succeed in local contracts by aligning offerings with community needs, optimizing efficiency in processes, and collaborating with local partners for enhanced capabilities. One such example is Sabre88’s contract with the Port Authority Trans Hudson (PATH), a pseudo-government organization whose heavy rail rapid-transit system serves as the primary transit link between Manhattan and neighboring New Jersey urban communities, as well as suburban commuter railroads. Local contracts can be found directly on the websites of the organizations who request the contract work.

Government contractors can strategically position themselves in the procurement landscape by understanding the distinct characteristics, opportunities, and challenges of federal, state, and local contracts. Whether aiming for national visibility, regional growth, or local community impact, government contracts offer many avenues for business expansion and meaningful contributions.

Cited Sources:

USFCR. “Understanding Federal, State, and Local Government Contracts.” Usfcr.com, 2023, blogs.usfcr.com/understanding-government-contracts-federal-state-local. Accessed 12 Apr. 2024.

“LinkedIn.” Linkedin.com, 2024, www.linkedin.com/pulse/navigating-federal-vs-state-contracts-strategic-guide-boun/. Accessed 12 Apr. 2024.

Comparison of Federal and State Procurement Requirements for FEMA Public Assistance Grants to North Carolina Local Governments. www.sog.unc.edu/sites/www.sog.unc.edu/files/general_media/Federal%20and%20State%20Procurement%20Comparison%20Chart%20-%20FEMA_3.pdf.

“NJ Division of Purchase and Property.” Nj.gov, 2024, www.nj.gov/treasury/purchase/. Accessed 12 Apr. 2024.

“OGS Centralized Contracts List.” Office of General Services, 2024, ogs.ny.gov/procurement/ogs-centralized-contracts-list. Accessed 12 Apr. 2024.

‌Photo Credit:

https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/united-states-capitol-building-sunset-600nw-1724685376.jpg

The History of the White House Easter Egg Roll

/in , /by

The White House Easter Egg Roll is a tradition that has captivated generations of Americans, blending the Easter spirit with the nation’s most important house. Since 1878, the White House has been home to one of the oldest annual events in its history—the Easter Egg Roll. The festive occasion, held on the South Lawn, brings families together in a spirit of joy and camaraderie.

The White House Easter Egg Roll began in the 19th century, when children would roll eggs down the slopes of Capitol Hill on Easter Monday. This tradition, filled with laughter and excitement, quickly gained popularity, becoming a popular Easter pastime for families in Washington D.C. and beyond. However, as the event grew in popularity, concerns arose about the impact of egg rolling on the grounds of Capitol Hill. The playful activities of children rolling eggs down the hill began to take a toll on the landscape, prompting authorities to take action. In 1876, a ban was placed on egg rolling on Capitol Hill, effectively putting an end to this beloved Easter tradition in that location.

Despite the ban, the spirit of Easter and the joy of egg rolling remained alive in the hearts of children and families. In a moment of inspiration and goodwill, President Rutherford B. Hayes made a historic decision in 1878 that would forever change the course of Easter celebrations in America. Recognizing the importance of preserving traditions and fostering a sense of community, President Hayes opened the South Lawn of the White House to egg rollers.

Throughout history, American presidents and their families have added their own unique touches to the Easter Egg Roll. From egg roll races hosted by the Nixons to wooden egg hunts with signatures of famous people by the Reagans, each administration has left its mark on this iconic event. Over the years, the Egg Roll has been enhanced by memorable attractions and souvenirs. From certificates of participation to plastic eggs with notes from First Ladies, these mementos add to the magic of the day.

The Egg Roll is not just a singular event but a day filled with many Easter related activities that cater to people of all ages and interests. Beyond the traditional egg rolling, attendees can immerse themselves in a world of excitement and fun through a variety of engaging and entertaining activities. One of the highlights is the egg ball game, where participants use specially designed balls resembling eggs to play a unique and lively version of traditional ball games. Another popular activity is the egg toss and catch, where participants form teams and test their coordination and teamwork skills by tossing and catching eggs at varying distances.

In addition to these egg-themed activities, the event offers a range of live entertainment options that cater to diverse tastes and interests. From musical performances and dance showcases to interactive shows and demonstrations, there’s something for everyone to enjoy and be entertained by. Moreover, storytelling sessions add a touch of magic and imagination to the day, transporting participants into enchanting worlds of  tales and adventures. Storytellers captivate audiences of all ages with their engaging narratives, fostering a love for storytelling and literature among attendees.

The Egg Roll has weathered challenges, including cancellations during wartime and inclement weather. Yet, it has always bounced back, showcasing the resilience and enduring spirit of the White House and its traditions. In recent years, the Egg Roll faced challenges due to the coronavirus outbreak, leading to cancellations by Presidents Trump and Biden, in 2020 and 2021 respectively.

As we look forward to the 2024 White House Easter Egg Roll, let’s celebrate its rich history, cherished traditions, and the joy it brings to families across the nation. It’s a time to come together to celebrate the United States and the Easter holiday.

Cited Sources:

“Easter Egg Roll: Fanfare and Keepsakes.” WHHA (En-US), 2022, www.whitehousehistory.org/easter-egg-roll-keepsakes. Accessed 22 Mar. 2024.

“Easter Egg Roll: Years without an Easter Monday.” WHHA (En-US), 2020, www.whitehousehistory.org/easter-egg-roll-wartime. Accessed 22 Mar. 2024.

“Easter Egg Roll: Games, Old and New.” WHHA (En-US), 2024, www.whitehousehistory.org/easter-egg-roll-games. Accessed 22 Mar. 2024.

“Origins of the White House Easter Egg Roll.” WHHA (En-US), 2023, www.whitehousehistory.org/origins-of-the-white-house-easter-egg-roll. Accessed 22 Mar. 2024.

Image Source:

“Gallery Item Display (U.S. National Park Service).” Nps.gov, 2024, www.nps.gov/media/photo/gallery-item.htm?pg=2940588&id=0e506461-0bbe-437f-ae05-278532644125&gid=2EE520BE-1DD8-B71C-07A70F451399D44D. Accessed 22 Mar. 2024.

Unbought and Unbossed: Celebrating Shirley Chisholm’s Impact on Women’s History

/in , /by

During Women’s History Month this March, it’s crucial to honor the remarkable women who have paved the way for gender equality and empowerment. Among these trailblazers stands Shirley Chisholm, a fearless leader whose unwavering commitment to justice and equality continues to inspire women globally. At Sabre88, we are excited to contribute towards equalizing opportunities between genders, following in the footsteps of trailblazers like Shirley Chisholm. The unbought, unbossed empowerment and advocacy embodied by Chisholm similarly fuels our commitment to creating a more inclusive and equitable future for all. 

Shirley Anita Chisholm was born on November 30, 1924, in the vibrant borough of Brooklyn, New York. Raised by immigrant parents hailing from Guyana and Barbados, Chisholm’s upbringing instilled in her a deep sense of resilience and determination. Even from a young age, she displayed a fiery passion for education and social justice, propelling her towards a future of advocacy and leadership.

After graduating with a Bachelor of Arts degree from Brooklyn College in 1946, Chisholm embarked on a journey that would ultimately reshape American politics. With her sights set on breaking barriers and championing the rights of marginalized communities.

Shirley Chisholm made history in 1968 by becoming the first Black woman elected to the United States Congress, representing New York’s 12th congressional district. Throughout her seven terms in Congress, she left an indelible mark on American politics by championing civil rights, women’s rights, and economic justice. Her fearless advocacy earned her the nickname “Fighting Shirley,” a testament to her unwavering commitment to principle.

During her tenure in Congress, Chisholm fearlessly fought for policies and legislation that aimed to address systemic inequalities and empower marginalized communities. She played a pivotal role in shaping laws that promoted social justice, including initiatives to expand access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities for all Americans. Chisholm’s relentless efforts paved the way for progress in areas such as voting rights, racial equality, and economic empowerment, leaving a lasting impact on the fabric of American society.

In addition to her legislative achievements, Chisholm’s groundbreaking presidential campaign in 1972 further solidified her legacy as a trailblazer in American politics. As the first African American woman to seek the nomination of a major political party, she shattered barriers and inspired generations of future leaders to pursue their dreams without limitations. Chisholm’s bold vision and unwavering dedication to justice continue to inspire activists and changemakers around the world, reminding us of the power of one individual to spark meaningful change.

Shirley Chisholm’s iconic slogan, “Unbought and Unbossed,” encapsulates her fearless spirit and refusal to conform to the status quo. Throughout her political career, she defied expectations and challenged the entrenched power structures that marginalized women and people of color. As the voice of the marginalized and disenfranchised, Chisholm shattered glass ceilings and paved the way for future generations of women to pursue their dreams and aspirations.

Shirley Chisholm’s impact extends far beyond her groundbreaking achievements in politics. Her legacy continues to inspire women and activists around the world, reminding us of the power of courage, resilience, and determination in the face of adversity. As we celebrate Women’s History Month, Sabre88 would like to recognize the commitment Shirley Chisholm made to the fight for gender equality and empowerment.

Cited Sources:

Michals, Debra.  “Shirley Chisholm.”  National Women’s History Museum.  National Women’s History Museum, 2015. March 8, 2024. 

“Shirley Chisholm.” Biography, Biography, 4 May 2021, www.biography.com/political-figures/shirley-chisholm. Accessed 8 Mar. 2024.

Zapata, Christian. “Shirley Chisholm – Facts, Accomplishments & Legacy | HISTORY.” HISTORY, 18 Dec. 2009, www.history.com/topics/us-government-and-politics/shirley-chisholm. Accessed 8 Mar. 2024.

‌“Shirley Chisholm (November 30, 1924 – January 1, 2005).” National Archives, 18 Nov. 2020, www.archives.gov/research/african-americans/individuals/shirley-chisholm. Accessed 8 Mar. 2024.

“Shirley Chisholm for President.” National Museum of African American History and Culture, 30 Sept. 2016, nmaahc.si.edu/shirley-chisholm-president. Accessed 8 Mar. 2024.

“Shirley A. Chisholm Biography» Women of the CBC» Avoice – Congressional Black Caucus Foundation» African American Voices in Congress.” Avoice – Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, 2022, avoice.cbcfinc.org/exhibits/women-of-the-cbc/shirley-a-chisholm-biography/. Accessed 8 Mar. 2024.

‌Photo Credit:

“Shirley Chisholm (American Politician and Activist) | Britannica.” Encyclopædia Britannica, 2024, www.britannica.com/biography/Shirley-Chisholm/images-videos. Accessed 8 Mar. 2024.

The Role of the HubZone Program in Empowering Black Communities

/in , /by

In today’s society, economic disparities disproportionately affect communities of color, particularly Black communities. Amidst these challenges, initiatives like the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Historically Underutilized Business Zones (HubZone) program are positive opportunities for economic empowerment and growth. From limited access to capital and resources to systemic barriers in accessing opportunities, these disparities hinder economic advancement and perpetuate cycles of poverty and inequality. Addressing these issues requires intentional efforts and targeted initiatives aimed at leveling the playing field. Sabre88 has been enrolled within the HubZone program for the past year. In this blog post, we will discuss the significant role of the HubZone program in bridging economic disparities and empowering Black communities across the United States.

The HubZone program is a federal initiative established to stimulate economic development in distressed areas by providing preferential access to government contracts. The program targets areas characterized by high unemployment rates, low median household incomes, or a combination of both. Businesses located in these designated HubZones can gain certification, unlocking opportunities for growth and sustainability.

At the heart of the HubZone program lies its ability to empower Black communities by offering avenues for entrepreneurship and job creation. By designating targeted areas as HubZones, the program directs resources and investments to communities that have historically been overlooked or marginalized. The ripple effect from HubZone designations fosters local business development, promotes job opportunities, and spurs economic activity from within.

One of the most significant barriers facing Black entrepreneurs is access to capital and contracts. The HubZone program addresses this challenge head-on by providing preferential treatment in federal contracting opportunities, including set-asides and sole-source awards. This levels the playing field, allowing Black-owned businesses in HubZone areas to compete more effectively and secure lucrative contracts that drive growth and sustainability.

As we celebrate Black History Month, it’s essential to recognize the role of initiatives like the HubZone program in advancing economic equality and justice. Moving forward, we must continue to advocate for policies and programs that dismantle systemic barriers and uplift underserved communities. By doing so, we can create a future where economic opportunities are accessible to all, regardless of race or zip code.

The HubZone program represents more than just a government initiative; it symbolizes a commitment to bridging economic disparities and empowering Black communities. Sabre88 is proud to be a HubZone company that is actively pursuing HubZone contracts. Through strategic investments, targeted support, and unwavering dedication, we can build a more inclusive and equitable society that represents all individuals. As we reflect on the significance of Black History Month, here at Sabre88 we are committed to the ongoing journey toward economic justice and empowerment for all.

The Role of the 8(a) Program in Advancing Economic Equity for Black Entrepreneurs

/in , /by

As we celebrate Black History Month this February, it’s important to recognize the pivotal role of initiatives like the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 8(a) Business Development Program in fostering economic equity and empowerment for Black entrepreneurs. Sabre88 is a proud 8(a) program graduate, during our tenure in the program many of our opportunities stemmed from the SBA’s 8(a) program. In this blog post, you will delve into the historical context and significance of the 8(a) program, tracing its roots back to the efforts of trailblazers like Congressman Parren Mitchell, and examine how it continues to break barriers and drive positive change for Black-owned businesses today.

The Legacy of Parren Mitchell

In the face of systemic barriers and discrimination, Black entrepreneurs have long faced challenges in accessing resources, networks, and opportunities for business growth. The journey towards economic equity and empowerment has been paved with the relentless efforts of individuals like Congressman Parren Mitchell, who fought against institutionalized racism to open doors for future generations. Congressman Mitchell’s advocacy in Congress, particularly his role in crafting the legislation Public Law 95-507, laid the groundwork for programs that support minority-owned businesses, including the 8(a) program.

Parren Mitchell’s legacy as a champion for civil rights and economic empowerment continues to inspire today. His tireless efforts in Congress, including his chairmanship of the House Small Business Committee, were instrumental in advancing policies that promoted the interests of Black entrepreneurs. Mitchell’s vision and leadership paved the way for the creation of the federal set-aside program, which reserved contracts for socially disadvantaged businesses, including those owned by Black individuals.

The Birth of the 8(a) Program

Stemming from Congressman Mitchell’s legacy, the 8(a) Business Development Program was established to provide targeted assistance to small businesses owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. This program, rooted in the principles of equity and inclusion, offers a comprehensive suite of resources and support mechanisms, including mentorship, training, access to capital, and contracting opportunities. By leveling the playing field and addressing historical disparities, the 8(a) program aims to empower Black entrepreneurs to succeed in the competitive marketplace.

Through access to federal contracting opportunities, the 8(a) program enables Black entrepreneurs to tap into lucrative markets and expand their businesses. Moreover, participation in the program fosters capacity building and competitiveness through specialized training and networking events. The success stories emerging from the 8(a) program underscore its transformative impact, illustrating how targeted support can break down barriers and unlock the full potential of Black entrepreneurship.

As we reflect on the significance of Black History Month, it’s crucial to acknowledge the profound contributions of individuals like Parren Mitchell and the enduring legacy of their advocacy. Programs like the 8(a) Business Development Program stand as a testament to the progress we’ve made in advancing economic equity and empowerment for Black entrepreneurs. As a minority owned company, and an 8(a) graduate, Sabre88 honors the past and continues to invest in initiatives that promote inclusion and opportunity.  Together, we can continue to break barriers and build a more equitable future for all.

Cited Sources:

Why do we still celebrate Black History Month? What is the intersection of Black History and gov’t contracting? 

https://govassociationblog.org/?p=660

Black History Month 8(a) Government Contracting Program Webinar https://www.sba.gov/event/41616

Celebrating Black History Month: SBA Programs and Resources https://www.sba.gov/blog/2024/2024-02/celebrating-black-history-month-sba-programs-resources

Photo Credit:

2019 Parren J. Mitchell Dinner with Rep. Elijah Cummings https://www.md30dems.org/2019_parren_j_mitchell_dinner

Celebrating Black History Month: Exploring the origins and evolution of the month within the U.S. Government

/in , /by

Black History Month, is observed annually in February, and stands as a testament to the long list of contributions by African Americans for the United States of America. This month-long celebration has a profound history rooted in the struggle for civil rights and recognition of the achievements of the black community.

The roots of Black History Month trace back to the pioneering efforts of Dr. Carter G. Woodson, often hailed as the “Father of Black History.” Dr. Woodson, an African American historian, scholar, and educator, recognized the need to highlight the historical and cultural achievements of black Americans. In 1926, Dr. Woodson initiated the first Negro History Week, choosing the second week of February to coincide with the birthdays of Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass, two iconic figures in the fight against slavery and for civil rights.

About Negro History Week

Negro History Week gained popularity across the nation, fostering a growing awareness of African American history. Over the years, communities, schools, and organizations began to embrace and expand the celebration, recognizing the importance of acknowledging black contributions throughout the entire  month of February.

Federal Government Recognition

The U.S. government played a pivotal role in recognizing and institutionalizing Black History Month. In 1976, President Gerald Ford officially recognized February as Black History Month, urging Americans to “seize the opportunity to honor the too-often neglected accomplishments of black Americans in every area of endeavor throughout our history.” This marked a significant milestone, elevating the status of Black History Month and emphasizing its national importance.

Subsequent presidents continued to endorse and promote Black History Month through official proclamations. These proclamations not only recognized the historical contributions of African Americans but also encouraged educational institutions and communities to organize events, programs, and activities that celebrate the diversity and resilience of the black community.

The evolution of Black History Month within the U.S. government is reflected in its integration into educational curricula. Schools and colleges now actively incorporate African American history into their programs, ensuring that students gain a comprehensive understanding of the nation’s diverse heritage. Government initiatives, such as the National African American History Month theme designated annually, also contribute to shaping the narrative and highlighting specific aspects of black history.

Black History Month stands as a testament to the progress made in acknowledging the significant contributions of African Americans throughout U.S. history. From its modest beginnings as Negro History Week to its recognition by the U.S. government, this celebration has become a cornerstone in fostering awareness, understanding, and appreciation for the diverse and invaluable impact of the black community. As we honor Black History Month each February, we continue to embrace the collective journey towards equality, justice, and a more inclusive future.

Cited Sources:

Black History Month: A Commemorative Observances Legal Research Guide https://guides.loc.gov/black-history-month-legal-resources/history-and-overview#:~:text=In%201975%2C%20President%20Ford%20issued,week%2Dlong%20observance%20to%20Black

Black History Month https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/black-history-month

About Black History Month https://asalh.org/about-us/about-black-history-month/

African American History Month https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/annual-observances/african-american-history-month

February is Black History Month https://www.blackhistorymonth.gov/

What you need to know about the origins of Black History Month https://apnews.com/article/black-history-month-things-to-know